Sharon's Anti-Racism Newsletter

Share this post
Will there be justice for Ahmaud?
www.antiracismnewsletter.com

Will there be justice for Ahmaud?

The (white) jury is literally still out

Sharon Hurley Hall
Nov 17, 2021
Comment6
Share

Hello friends,

As I write this, a mostly white jury is hearing the evidence in the case of the murder of Ahmaud Arbery committed by Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael and William "Roddie" Bryan Jr. These three white men saw Ahmaud jogging, chased him down, and shot him.

While many of us became active in social justice after the murder of George Floyd, for others (like Future Cain and Cholia Johnson, to name just two examples), it was the shooting of Ahmaud, earlier in the year, that caused them to join the anti-racism fight.

Perhaps it was because he was doing something so normal and everyday, and was killed because of it. (Though really we should say Ahmaud was killed because of racism, as he wasn’t doing anything wrong.)

People could put themselves in his running shoes, and imagine what would happen to them in the same situation. White people knew they could jog through any neighborhood, and not be in danger. Black people knew they could face danger in any neighborhood, and had a new fear about the possible consequences of jogging while Black.

Ahmaud was doing something tens of thousands of people do every day. But as a Black man, he didn’t get the benefit of the doubt. He was judged to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and he paid the ultimate price.

There’s a tremendous irony in the fact that the project of whiteness and colonization happened in spaces where Black and Brown people, Indigenous people, and people of color were already living. White people inserted themselves into those spaces and took them over where they could, promptly making rules about where those same Black and Brown people could live and breathe.

White people followed the same patterns after trafficking and enslaving Africans in the Americas. Even after the end of those periods of enslavement, there continued to be spaces in every village, town, city and country where Black people couldn’t go. In Barbados, some Black people still won’t go to the Barbados Yacht Club because, until the 80s, Black people couldn’t go in unless they were staff. In fact, to this day, the demographic of the customers is predominantly pale. And that’s just one example.

The question I keep asking myself is: in the 21st century, is it right for white people in America (or anywhere) to determine where Black people should be, based on the color of their skin? The answer is a resounding no. Most right-thinking people agree that South African apartheid was wrong. How is this any different?

And I’m also wondering, as many others are, whether this jury will give Ahmaud Arbery and his family the justice they deserve, convict his murderers, and put them away for a long, long time. As with similar cases, there’s no way of telling. There is a video of the shooting, so conviction should be a foregone conclusion, but it isn’t. And that really hurts. Because yet again, it tells Black people that our lives don’t matter. Not to the system, and not to the people who feel free to hunt us down and kill us.

How long must we wait for justice for Black people to look like justice for white people? If the past is anything to judge by, we could be waiting a long, long time.

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading,

Sharon

© Sharon Hurley Hall, 2021. All Rights Reserved.

Cover photo courtesy of Canva.

I am an anti-racism writer, a professional B2B writer and blogger, and co-host of The Introvert Sisters podcast. If you value my perspective, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription.

Comment6
ShareShare

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

chris custer
Writes chris’s Newsletter ·Nov 17, 2021Liked by Sharon Hurley Hall

Ms. Hurley-Hall, I am concentrating on your comment on Black people never get the benefit of doubt. An important part of giving the benefit of the doubt(BOD) is trust. Lack of DOB may be a necessary condition for racism, but not the only condition. You are not giving the BOD, if you don't trust the person receiving the BOD. The idea of not trusting black people, is used as a rationalization to the doctrine of racism. On this trust issue, Whites fail miserably. The general idea of Whites only giving BOD to white people is seriously found wanting. Not giving black people the BOD is a characteristic of racism.

Lower socio-economic groups don’t have the leisure of giving the the benefit of the doubt, for if they are wrong it might effect them much more than more well-off people. Additionally, apparently, Ahmad Aubrey didn't deserve the BOD of white people. The result of not giving the the BOD, another young black man is dead.

Expand full comment
ReplyGive gift
1 reply by Sharon Hurley Hall
founding
Mitchell Allen
Nov 17, 2021Liked by Sharon Hurley Hall

That gurgling sound you hear is my blood boiling. The hubris is appalling. "License to kill" takes on a grim reality when card holders are abetted by juries and judges that feel the same way. Yeah, I'm talking about Kenosha County...grrrrr!

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply by Sharon Hurley Hall
4 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Sharon Hurley Hall
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing