This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Hello {{ first name | friends}},

It’s time for the monthly reboot. And this month it’s about labels and names - the power they have, and the power we give them. I’m publishing the article pretty much as originally written, and have included some updates in brackets throughout.

On the Labelling of Black People

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about labels - specifically, the labels that frame the views of Black and Brown people. Labels in history, and labels now. About how they can be used to unite, and about how they can be used to divide.

What Should You Call Black People?

Let’s start with the point that we Black and Brown people don’t always agree about how to label ourselves. I’ve been clear since childhood that I was a Black girl, then I became a Black woman.

But when I was a child, there were terms harking back to an earlier way of describing Black people. For example, the term “coloured”, which I heard occasionally in the Caribbean, and met again when I lived in the UK. It’s a term I personally don’t like, because of all the associations with the administration of the system of enslavement, like the one-drop rule, for example. And I hate the N-word with a fiery passion. It’s not something I will ever reclaim, no matter how you spell it.

I’m firmly with those who say “just call me Black”. (Africans in their home countries, of course, often identify with either their countries or other cultural identities; they have to leave the continent for their colour to be a factor.)

Can you help? My fellow writer KS Hernandez worked as a driver till forced to stop because of injury and is still struggling to make rent. and buy food. KS has a GoFundMe here.

How to Handle Multiple Heritages

Then there’s the term “mixed” for people with dual or multiple heritages (which, let’s face it, is everybody, if you start digging into DNA, but anyhoo). As someone mentioned in an article I cited recently, it makes it sound like people are cakes, which they are not, and kind of erases their heritage.

Other terms such as “biracial” at least acknowledge their multiple identities, though that’s not perfect either. Since race is an artificial concept created to oppress Black and Brown people, how can it mean anything to be biracial? Or, for that matter, “mixed race”. I guess that’s a question for another time.

My resident expert, similar to some writers, prefers that we see people with multiple heritages as full expressions of those heritages. Even if as a Brown person, she’ll still be seen as Black, she wants to acknowledge the fullness of both her Caribbean and her English heritage. [2024 update: she now says she’s Black, because she says it’s how the world sees her - lots to unpack there.]

Are All Black People African-American? No!

Then there’s the term “African-American”. Some Black Americans use it; others don’t. Non-Black people may assume that every Black person they see in the USA is African-American, but they’d be wrong. There are Black people in the USA from all over the world - Caribbean people, Africans, Brits and more. They’re more likely to identify as Black than African-anything, especially coming from societies in which any association with things African was derided. While we’d all like to think that we finally see Black as beautiful - and many do - even in the 21st century, there are those who call things African with a derisive curl of the lip. I don’t agree with that stance, either, but it definitely exists.

Hiding Identity Behind Alphabet Soup

Next, there are the acronyms - BAME (Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic), which I believe replaced the older BME (Black and Minority Ethnic), POC (People of Colour), BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Colour). The good thing about them is that in the main, most people know you’re talking about Black and Brown people, but that’s also the bad thing. Identities get erased and the waters get muddied. There’s a pressure to be super inclusive, even when you’re only talking about one community. And there’s a tendency to use the terms interchangeably, when there are multiple identities bound up in them. [2024 update: Even the term “inclusive” has its issues for me, because it implies that someone is gatekeeping who gets to be included and who doesn’t.]

Who’s the Minority?

Then there’s the term “minority” or “minority ethnic”. This one always bothers me because I don’t feel like a minority. There are more non-white people in the world than white people. Black and Brown people are actually the MAJORITY of the world’s population, even if we may not be the majority in individual countries. Calling people minorities may be descriptive, but it is also dismissive, and tends to be used to permit a whole lot of institutionally racist behaviour and systems.

Of late, I’ve been using the term “people of the global majority” - I’d love to know who invented it so I can give proper credit (UPDATE: This powerful phrase was coined by Rosemary Campbell-Stephens) - to remind me of that fact. And if everyone used it, wouldn’t it then seem more important to act in a way that benefited that majority, like say, ending systemic racism? Food for thought. [2024 update: at Mission Equality we talk about “deliberately disadvantaged” people to reflect our awareness of the intentionality of systemic oppression.]

How I Handle Issues of Naming

My own approach - and you’ll have to choose your own - is to say what I mean. As a Black person, I speak most knowledgeably about the experiences of Black people. (I know a helluva lot about whiteness too, as every Black person does). If I’m talking about Latine people, I talk about Latine (though it’s not my community and I can only speak about the experiences that may intersect with my own). Ditto Indigenous people.

Blanket labels can help us have a conversation, but they can also obscure vastly different cultural and personal experiences. As an anti-racist, it’s up to you to look behind and beyond the labels, and to hear individual stories, and to know - or find out - when a particular term is right to use, and when it’s not. And remember, if you’re not sure, just ask people how they identify. [2024 update: I still think this awareness is crucial. Global Majority people aren’t monoliths. Keeping that in mind can help people avoid missteps in this area.]

Thanks for reading. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Sharon

What did you think of today's article?

Login or Subscribe to participate

If you enjoyed it, please share to help others discover it. Thank you!

I am an anti-racism educator and activist, Co-Founder of Mission Equality, the author of “I’m Tired of Racism”, and co-host of The Introvert Sisters podcast.

© Sharon Hurley Hall, 2021, 2024. All Rights Reserved. This newsletter is published on beehiiv (affiliate link).

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Ingrid Wilson2 years ago

Thanks for this insightful article Sharon. Personally I do not like the term "coloured" either nor do I like he term "member of a marginalized community".

First of my preference is to be reference by my name or failing that referencing me as a Black woman is fine. I do agree with you that all of this is a person choice

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

Thanks for adding your perspective, Ingrid.

Avatar

Mitch Mitchell2 years ago

I enjoyed this article a lot. I never used the term "colored", and neither did my parents. But we definitely started using the term "black", and it's all James Brown's fault! lol Still, it felt like a real identity at the time, and it still does today. I don't balk when I hear the term people of color; sensibilities change, people try to be respectful, and as long as no one uses an "old" term that feels insensitive, I'm ready to give them a pass. And of course however a person wants to be called is fine with me.

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

I appreciate your perspective, Mitch!

Avatar

Will Cuthbert (they/he)2 years ago

Reading articles like this is invaluable to combating my racism, and understanding the fullness of how language helps and harms. Thank you 🖤

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

Thanks so much, Will!

Avatar

Robin Taylor2 years ago

I recently read an article by Eve L. Ewing regarding the capitalization of the words Black and White. I'm familiar with capitalizing Black as a linguistic standard, but the idea that I should also capitalize white felt... inappropriate maybe? Is there more to this dialogue that I could learn from?

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

That's an interesting one, Robin. Some of the people I've most often seen capitalising the W are far right folx, though that's not universal. But because of that I tend to avoid it for my personal use. However, there's no general agreement on that as far as I know.

Avatar

Linda Berberich2 years ago

You know how I feel about labels, given that you are one of the few people who I've trusted with my writing on identity. I remember when I brought my friend D up to Canada to meet my parents and my mom asking him about his preference - he got offended by her asking and said to her, curtly: "Just call me Darryl." My mom felt so embarrassed but I assured her it's always best to ask than to assume.

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

Ask, don't assume is always good advice - agreed, Linda.

Avatar

Karrie H2 years ago

Thank you for shedding light on this important topic.

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

Thanks, Karrie.

Avatar

Nicole Fende2 years ago

I remember years ago (ok decades), when I was an intern at a large corporation I had two colleagues who were both in the global majority and both from the US. One wanted to be referred to as Black, the other African American. Perhaps viewing it as pronouns? Asking the preference of the person? Would that be appropriate?

Here in the US there was another consequence of language which I was recently made aware of at a conference in my hometown in Michigan. There was a panel discussion which included a Native American who was also an attorney. He pointed out there are legal ramifications of not using the term Indian because of the language in treaties signed between tribes and the US. While he preferred either referencing his specific tribe's name or Native American, there is a real concern about losing rights if they stray too far from the nomenclature of the treaties.

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

Hi Nicole, yes, I definitely go with how people describe themselves.

Thanks for the additional insight into the ramifications of nomenclature for Indigenous people.

Avatar

Meghan Kowalski2 years ago

One of the language changes I made was to say "minoritized groups" instead of "minorities." I'm now questioning if that is appropriate.

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

That's a step forward, Meghan. It's not as simple as one choice for all situations, unfortunately. Context matters too.

Avatar

Barbara Phillips2 years ago

So….sounds like “Black” is the way to go. Unless obviously “mixed”. Love “people of the global majority” buts it’s less specific and a mouthful. Thanks!

Avatar

Sharon Hurley HallAuthor2 years ago

I go with call people what they want to be called, Barbara. For me, it's Black; it might not be for others.